Thoughts of hope for the students on strike today – and one person’s apology for his generation’s failure

The schoolchildren on strike from school today in more than 100 countries are staging a global protest essentially about the failure of my generation to deal with climate change. They should of course be daunted by that collective failure. But they can also be uplifted by the opportunities they and the millennial generation have to do far better than us.

My generation has failed for many reasons, but one holds the key to what younger generations must now do. We have tended to fiddle at the edge of solutions, not embracing the system changes required. In doing so, many of us have either exercised denial about the full extent of the problems, or only pretended to address them.

The challenge, for those who cannot now afford to fail, involves more than climate change. Many researchers of past human civilisations tell us that our globalised civilisation may well now be in the early stages of collapsing, as things stand. Dozens of regional civilisations  have crashed before us, across the last 4,000 years of human history. They did so for a variety of reasons, but some recur, and three in particular: climatic change, environmental degradation, and inequality.

All three of these are heading in the wrong direction in the modern world. The younger generations will need to find fixes for all of them, in parallel. Human history suggests that tackling any one of them and failing on others can unravel organised society.

Climate change is clearly being driven by rising global average temperature. Climate-related disasters are equally clearly becoming more damaging, pushing the world towards a point – if current trends are allowed to continue – where wealth will be destroyed faster than any means to create it, and access to food and clean water will be impossible for many.

Environmental degradation is starkly expressed in calculations of ecological footprint: the measurement of how fast we consume resources and generate waste versus how fast nature can absorb our waste and generate new resources. The former exceeds the latter, and increasingly so.

Inequality has risen to ridiculous proportions since the financial crash of 2008, with just 26 people now owning as much wealth as the poorest 50% of the global population. One percent of the global population owns 82% of the wealth. The global elite turns up at the World Economic Forum in Davos every January, agonises over the risk to social cohesion that this inequality is creating, then goes away, does little or nothing, and returns the next year to even worse inequality statistics.

Daunting as this trio of problems is, were I in my teens skipping school to protest on the streets, or in my twenties and a rising politician, say, I would be much buoyed by the evidence that all three can be overcome. Let me offer some bullish thoughts based on experience in my generation.

In abating climate change, for example, many of us on the front lines of the insurgent clean-energy technologies believe we can quickly replace – or convert – the fossil-fuel incumbents in the time required to avert disaster. Many economists calculate we can do so with significant net economic benefits compared to the status quo trajectory.

In containing environmental degradation, for example, many of us believe it is possible to replace linear progression from resource to waste with a circular economy, solving many environmental problems with net economic benefits.

In reversing inequality, for example, long-delayed reforms to capitalism – called for after the financial crisis even by many in the elite – hold enormous potential. The scope for progressive taxes, the chasing down of evaded tax, and the curtailment of laundered dirty money is huge. Even a miniscule wealth tax would provide a significant war chest for poverty alleviation, equality and survival.

As I pray for the success of the younger generations where mine has failed, I find encouragement in evidence that they understand the holistic nature of their challenge, and the system changes they will need to engineer. I see it in the speeches they deliver, the banners they carry on the streets, and the Green New Deal they espouse.  On behalf of my generation – those of us who have tried and failed, those who have only pretended to try, and those who have not even bothered – I wish them the wisdom, courage, and luck they will need for execution. And I apologise with all my heart.


  1. Well said, as usual, @JL. I agree with both you through your apology, and Greta. It’s not that hard – in fact not hard at all – we just need to DO it.

  2. There are lots of things that need putting right, but intergenerational apologising for humanities failings feels misplaced. (It reminds me of Tony Blair trying to apologise for slavery.)

    I think the kids could play this differently too; it’s their call obviously, but striking feels like a kop out; a mirror to their parents own sense of helplessness. I particularly found the FT interview (23/219) with Greta Thunberg depressing rather than uplifting. A quick hats off for the courage and chutzpah to take the initiative – but it´s a form of mimicry which has limited leverage and starts by creating a division.

    Instead of going on strike, they could choose a different way of doing things. More constructive and counter intuitive would be to stay at school for an extra day per week and learn the many facets of energy (societal) transition, understand what actually drives change across the piece, learn the tools that will help, understand how to build successful coalitions (business, financial, political) and how to achieve consensual decisions and collaborative partnerships. Perhaps better than a strike, they might also drag their parents for a day at school too (Saturday or Sunday morning?), and for as long as it takes to achieve something concrete. Turn negative placard politics into positivity.

    You know better than most that to achieve the transition of a complex industrial construct to another, or others, will require boundless innovation, and a political wisdom to forge unusual collaborative relationships across all strata of society. Adults might have some experience to provide such guidance without undermining youth’s enthusiasm to do it their way. Otherwise, I fear, plus ca change, plus c’est le meme chose.

    1. This would require an international initiative for teachers / others willing to give up their time to come into schools on the weekend – not sure where the funding for that would come from. They can learn all they can, but it’s not going to create a system change until they have the power to do this themselves and by then it will be too late!

  3. Inequality tends to increase in societies with serious ecological problems. When there are less resources, whether it is because there are less unexploited mineral resources, or because agriculture is suffering due to ecological issues, egalitarian distribution of those resources becomes a problem.
    If we solve the ecological problems, solving inequality would be a walk in the park. But as long as there are serious ecological problems, inequality will be a thorny issue.

  4. The youth-led strikers want practical action on the climate crisis, not a near empty Commons debate. The extinction rebels want business and government to take systemic climate action now. I agree that this means a transition to a circular, green, decarbonised economy. Currently, our cowboy economy treats the air we breathe as an ‘open pool resource’ where we dump polluting Co2 and toxic gases, causing global warming and poor health.
    However, treating the air as a legal person with rights and as rule governed Commons with a cap on annual emissions would be a system change. One example is the Manchester proposal for a clean air zone and daily vehicle pollution charges.

    So let’s establish a UK Air Trust, and a Global Air Trust that collects a tithe, say of 1% of all fossil fuel bills. This can be reinvested in decarbonising measures as green public transport, insulating houses and community renewable energy. And as the wealthiest 10% consume 50% of the energy we use, a redistributive Air Trust could help tackle inequality as well as a green turning.

    Martin Large
    Stroud Common Wealth

  5. How about a campaign to install Solar Panels at all Schools, Colleges and Universities?? This might be politically easier at the moment, would give hope to all students and encourage solution based interactions. Climate Change should appear on all school curriculums and information is key to change. A system of real time air and water monitors are a start to see the problems and the effectiveness of the solutions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *